Controle pressórico e inércia terapêutica no ambulatório escola da Universidade Iguaçu / Pressure control and therapeutic inertia in the outpatient school of the Iguaçu University

Introdução: Conhecer as taxas de controle da pressão do Ambulatório Escola da Universidade Iguaçu, as estratégias terapêuticas e a taxa de inércia terapêutica frente aos pacientes não controlados, são fundamentais para estabelecer estratégias de alcance de metas pressóricas. Objetivo: Determinar a taxa de pacientes na meta e fora da meta de pressão arterial, a estratégia terapêutica em uso e a taxa de inércia terapêutica frente aos pacientes não controlados. Metodologia: Estudo observacional, prospectivo e analítico através de análise dos prontuários e entrevista com pacientes consecutivos atendidos no ambulatório escola da Universidade Iguaçu, com >18 anos, no período de agosto a dezembro de 2019. Análise de dados demográficos, condições clínicas associadas e presença de outros fatores de risco. Resultados: 202 pacientes estudados na pesquisa, faixa etária de 18 a 85 anos, com 91,08% dos pacientes com hipertensão arterial (40 e 79 anos). Analisando as taxas de controle, 61,38 % encontram-se na meta de pressão arterial de acordo com o risco cardiovascular, segundo a Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia, e 38,6%, dos pacientes não se encontram na meta. A adesão terapêutica elevada foi observada em 29,83% dos pacientes na meta vrs 26,92% dos pacientes fora da meta. A taxa de inercia terapêutica foi de 41,03% pacientes com conduta mantida. Conclusão: Dos pacientes atendidos, 38,61% estão fora da meta de pressão arterial, e a inercia terapêutica é um importante problema. Como a maioria dos pacientes hipertensos sem comorbidades são acompanhados nas unidades básicas de saúde por generalistas, a capacitação desses profissionais é de grande importância para um melhor controle da pressão arterial.

Introduction:Knowing the pressure control rates of the outpatient school at the Iguaçu University, therapeutic strategies and the rate of therapeutic inertia in the face of uncontrolled patients are essential to establish strategies to achieve pressure goals. Objective: Determine the rate of patients on and off the blood pressure target, the therapeutic strategy in use and the rate of therapeutic inertia compared to uncontrolled patients. Methodology:Observational, prospective and analytical study through analysis of medical records and interviews with consecutive patients over 18 years old seen at the outpatient school at Universidade Iguaçu, from August to December 2019. Analysis of demographic data, associated clinical conditions and the presence of others risk factors. Results:202 patients studied in the research, age range from 18 to 85 years, with 91.08% of patients with arterial hypertension (40 and 79 years). Analyzing the control rates, 61.38% are on the blood pressure target according to cardiovascular risk, according to the Brazilian Society of Cardiology, and 38.6%, of the patients are not on the target. High therapeutic adherence was observed in 29.83% of patients on target vs. 26.92% of patients off target. The therapeutic inertia rate was 41.3% of patients in the target. Conclusion: Of the patients seen, 38.61% are outside the blood pressure target, and therapeutic inertia is an important problem. As the majority of hypertensive patients without comorbidities are monitored in basic health units by general practitioners, the training of these professionals is of great importance for a better control of blood pressure

Chagas disease: Present status of pathogenic mechanisms and chemotherapy

There are approximately 7.8 million people in Latin America, including Chile, who suffer from Chagas disease and another 28 million who are at risk of contracting it. Chagas is caused by the flagellate protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi. It is a chronic disease, where 20 percent-30 percent of infected individuals develop severe cardiopathy, with heart failure and potentially fatal arrhythmias. Currently, Chagas disease treatment is more effective in the acute phase, but does not always produce complete parasite eradication during indeterminate and chronic phases. At present, only nifurtimox or benznidazole have been proven to be superior to new drugs being tested. Therefore, it is necessary to find alternative approaches to treatment of chronic Chagas. The current treatment may be rendered more effective by increasing the activity of anti-Chagasic drugs or by modifying the host's immune response. We have previously shown that glutathione synthesis inhibition increases nifurtimox and benznidazole activity. In addition, there is increasing evidence that cyclooxygenase inhibitors present an important effect on T. cruzi infection. Therefore, we found that aspirin reduced the intracellular infection in RAW 264.7 cells and, decreased myocarditis extension and mortality rates in mice. However, the long-term benefit of prostaglandin inhibition for Chagasic patients is still unknown.